Sample Sustainability Rating Report
An illustrative example of a full SYNE Sustainability Rating report - the dimension scorecard, criteria-level detail, peer benchmark, and SYNE Index position an unlisted organisation actually receives.
Amara Health Foundation
Unlisted, non-profit · Rating date: 9 July 2026 · Methodology v1.2
Why Amara Health Foundation is rated A.
Amara Health Foundation is rated A (composite score 71.3/100), continuing its upgrade path from an initial B rating two review cycles ago, driven by consistently strong mission delivery and improving board oversight.
Social Impact & Community is the strongest dimension at AA, reflecting well-documented beneficiary outcomes and active community engagement. Governance, at AA, benefits from a recently strengthened board structure, though conflict-of-interest documentation remains an area for improvement. Economic & Industry, at B, is the foundation's most improvable dimension - funding diversification remains concentrated in a small number of grant sources.
Amara sits in the Emerging Stars quadrant of the SYNE Index: governance and data verification are comparatively mature for an organisation of its size, while environmental, social and economic performance still have room to grow before the foundation moves into Front Runners.
Four dimensions, weighted to 100.
Scored under the Sustainability Ratings Methodology's Environmental (25%), Social (20%), Governance (35%, including controversies & disclosure quality), and Economic & Industry (20%) framework - 60 criteria in total.
Environmental
Developing resource use and waste management practices, proportionate to the foundation's size.
Social
Well-documented mission delivery and strong beneficiary outcome tracking.
Governance
Strengthened board oversight; conflict-of-interest documentation still maturing.
Economic & Industry
Funding remains concentrated in a small number of grant sources.
All 16 representative criteria behind each score.
Amara is scored against all 60 criteria in the Sustainability Ratings Methodology. The table below shows all four criteria per dimension, with their individual score and data quality flag.
| Criterion | Dimension | Score | Data Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resource & Energy Use | Environmental | 65 | Disclosed |
| Waste & Emissions Management | Environmental | 60 | Estimated |
| Environmental Policy & Commitments | Environmental | 75 | Disclosed |
| Facilities & Operational Footprint | Environmental | 72 | Assured |
| Mission Delivery & Beneficiary Outcomes | Social | 90 | Assured |
| Workforce Practices & Wellbeing | Social | 78 | Disclosed |
| Community & Stakeholder Engagement | Social | 85 | Assured |
| Diversity, Equity & Inclusion | Social | 75 | Disclosed |
| Board & Oversight Structure | Governance | 80 | Assured |
| Financial Controls & Stewardship | Governance | 85 | Assured |
| Conflict of Interest Management | Governance | 70 | Disclosed |
| Regulatory & Legal Compliance | Governance | 65 | Estimated |
| Economic Value Generation & Distribution | Economic & Industry | 55 | Disclosed |
| Institution-Type Materiality Factors | Economic & Industry | 60 | Disclosed |
| Funding Diversification & Sustainability | Economic & Industry | 50 | Estimated |
| Sector Positioning & Resilience | Economic & Industry | 67 | Disclosed |
How Amara compares to sector peers.
Ranked against a sample peer set of health and community nonprofits, drawn from the SYNE Index Sector family.
| Rank | Organisation | Composite Score | Grade | SYNE Index Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brightpath Community Trust | 78.3 | AA | Front Runners |
| 2 | Amara Health Foundation | 71.3 | A | Emerging Stars |
| 3 | Solace Family Services | 69.1 | A | Rising Stars |
| 4 | Harborview Relief Network | 52.7 | B | Emerging Stars |
| - | Sector average | 67.8 | A | - |
Standards Alignment & Data Quality, plotted.
Front Runners
Strong Environmental, Social and Economic & Industry performance, backed by well-governed, independently verified disclosure.
Rising Stars
Strong underlying performance, with governance, disclosure or controversy management still maturing.
Emerging Stars
Well-governed and well-verified, but with narrower Environmental, Social or Economic & Industry ambition.
● Amara Health FoundationBackmarkers
Limited performance across the three performance dimensions, with unresolved governance or disclosure gaps.
Three review cycles.
| Review date | Composite score | Grade | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 Jul 2026 | 71.3 | A | - Affirmed |
| 10 Jul 2025 | 62.8 | A | ▲ Upgrade |
| 11 Jul 2024 | 54.1 | B | Initial rating |
Rating Committee sign-off.
Amara Health Foundation is a fictional organisation created for illustration only. This sample report is provided to show the structure of a real SYNE Sustainability Rating deliverable. It is not an audit opinion or a guarantee of future performance - see the Terms of Use and Sustainability Ratings Methodology for how a real rating is built and what it does and does not represent.
The product and methodology behind this report.
See what a real Sustainability Rating would look like for you.
Talk to our team about commissioning a rating, or request a demo of the full reporting experience.